Resistance of fly ash geopolymer binders to organic acids
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Fly ash geopolymers are a relatively new class of binders with the potential to reduce the CO 2 emissions associated with Portland cement based construction materials. This paper reports on the organic acid resistance of fly ash geopolymers following exposure to acetic and lactic acid. Organic acids are prevalent in many circumstances including agriculture, production processes and waste management. These findings demonstrate that the surface of fly ash geopolymers had superior resistance to organic acids when compared with traditional Portland cement, evidenced by smaller mass losses. This was attributed to the formation of reaction products which were less susceptible to acid attack than those formed in Portland cement systems due to their lower calcium content. However, despite the surface of fly ash geopolymers appearing less deteriorated due to organic acid attack, they were found to have a higher porosity than their Portland cement counterparts making them more susceptible to acid ingress.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it