Incidencia de los métodos y técnicas en el desarrollo de destrezas con criterio de desempeño del bloque curricular geométrico de los alumnos del octavo año de educación general básica del colegio “Hernán Gallardo Moscoso”, del barrio Belén de la parroquia Sucre cantón y provincia de Loja, periodo 2012-2013. Lineamientos alternativos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research is a study of the incidence of methods and techniques in the development of skills with performance criterion of geometric curriculum block of students in the eighth year of general education basic school Hernan Gallardo Moscoso, of the quarter Belen de Sucre parish canton and province of Loja, 2012-2013 period, whose general objective is to: analyze how it affects the methods and techniques in the development of skills with performance criteria of geometric curriculum block the eighth year education General basic of the aforementioned college students. Is achieved by contrasting the hypothetical approach:Methods and techniques that use teachers Belen de Sucre parish affects the development of skills with performance criteria of the curricular block geometry of the pupils of the eighth year education General basic school Hernan Gallardo Moscoso, of the quarter canton and province of Loja, 2012-2013 period Check that it is conducted through a survey aimed at students and teachers of eighth year of basic General education; After applying it proceeded to the tabulation and analysis of results obtained as conclusions: that if they know the conceptions of methods and techniques but do not use different methods and techniques but it develops their classes under the inductive method and techniques exhibition and graphic organizers. The results allowed to develop a poposal on: lesson plans using methods and active techniques that allow you to develop skills with performance criteria in students in the indicated year.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".