MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3080269450 · doi:10.5539/jmr.v12n5p20

Hybrid Orthonormal Bernstein and Block-Pulse Method for the Solution of New System of Volterra Integro-differential Equations

2020· article· en· W3080269450 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ahmad M. Alenezi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematics Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicFractional Differential Equations Solutions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsVariety (cybernetics)Orthonormal basisPulse (music)Differential equationApplied mathematicsBlock (permutation group theory)Mathematical analysisComputer scienceGeometryStatisticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, Hybrid of Bernstein and Block-Pulse techniques (HOBM) is approaching to disband arrangement of non-linear integro-differential equations which emerge in biological model. The HOBM constringe the model of our problem into composed arrangement of non-linear necessitarian equations and this consequent variety respecting necessitarian arrangement are settled by Newton’s numerical technique. Likewise, the arrangements obtained by present methodologies have been contrasted and that respecting by some current procedures accessible in writing. Some interpretative models have been discussed to show the applicability and accuracy respecting the present strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.899
Threshold uncertainty score0.947

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.268
GPT teacher head0.443
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematics ResearchSame topicFractional Differential Equations SolutionsFrench-language works237,207