Infection With a Novel <i>Rickettsiella</i> Species in Emperor Scorpions ( <i>Pandinus imperator</i> )
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rickettsiella infection was diagnosed in 4 adult emperor scorpions ( Pandinus imperator) from 2 different collections over a 3-year period. One case had a 2-day history of weakness, failure to lift the tail, or respond to stimulation, with rapid progression to death. The other 3 cases were found dead. There were no gross lesions, but histologically the hemolymphatic vasculature and sinuses, presumed hematopoietic organ, heart, midgut and midgut diverticula, nerves, and skeletal muscle were infiltrated with phagocytic and granular hemocytes with necrosis. Phagocytic hemocytes contained abundant intracellular microorganisms that were Fite’s acid-fast-positive, Macchiavello-positive, variably gram-positive or gram-negative, and Grocott’s methenamine silver-negative. By transmission electron microscopy, hemocytes contained numerous phagocytic vacuoles with small dense bacterial forms (mean 0.603 × 0.163 μm) interspersed with large bacterial forms (mean 1.265 × 0.505 μm) and few intermediary forms with electron-dense nucleoids and membrane-bound crystalline arrays (average 4.72 μm). Transmission electron microscopy findings were consistent with bacteria of the family Coxiellaceae. Based on sequencing the 16S ribosomal RNA gene, the identity was confirmed as Rickettsiella, and phylogenetic analysis of protein-coding genes gidA, rspA, and sucB genes suggested the emperor scorpion pathogen as a new species. This study identifies a novel Rickettsiella causing infection in emperor scorpions and characterizes the unique pathological findings of this disease. We suggest this organism be provisionally named Rickettsiella scorpionisepticum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".