MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3080366019 · doi:10.1364/ome.400058

Ultraviolet hollow-core waveguides with sub-unitary index chalcogenide cladding

2020· article· en· W3080366019 on OpenAlexaff
Jinxiang Li, Behrad Gholipour, Davide Piccinotti, Kevin F. MacDonald, Nikolay I. Zheludev

Bibliographic record

VenueOptical Materials Express · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPhase-change materials and chalcogenides
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilChina Scholarship CouncilMinistry of Education, IndiaMinistry of Education - Singapore
KeywordsMaterials scienceCladding (metalworking)Refractive indexChalcogenideOpticsOptoelectronicsUltravioletWavelengthMolar absorptivityChalcogenide glassPhotorefractive effectCore (optical fiber)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The chalcogenide semiconductor antimony telluride exhibits a sub-unitary refractive index as low as 0.7 at mid- to near-UV wavelengths between 220 and 400 nm, with the spectral width of the sub-unitary band, minimum index and associated extinction coefficient being controllable functions of alloy composition. As such it can enable step-index hollow-core optical waveguiding at ultraviolet wavelengths and thereby, for example, spectroscopic and sensing applications wherein the confinement of light and a fluid analyte in the same core volume maximizes sensitivity, thereby limiting required interaction lengths to as little as a few wavelengths.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptical Materials ExpressSame topicPhase-change materials and chalcogenidesFrench-language works237,207