MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Pediatric Neurology Research in the Twenty-First Century: Status, Challenges, and Future Directions Post–COVID-19

2020· article· en· W3080449855 on OpenAlexaff
Joshua L. Bonkowsky, Gabrielle deVeber, Barry E. Kosofsky, Erika F. Augustine, Alexander G. Bassuk, Amy R. Brooks‐Kayal, Ryan J. Felling, Heather J. Fullerton, Hannah C. Glass, Zachary M. Grinspan, Réjean M. Guerriero, Michael Johnston, Ariel M. Lyons‐Warren, Steven Maricich, Patricia L. Musolino, Scott L. Pomeroy, Brenda E. Porter, Jong M. Rho, Alexander Rotenberg, Bradley L. Schlaggar, Renée A. Shellhaas, Elliott H. Sherr, Janet S. Soul

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Neurology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAdolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Cancer InstituteNational Institute of Mental HealthWeill Cornell Medical CollegeNational Institutes of HealthEpilepsiatutkimussäätiöbluebird bioPTC TherapeuticsBrainsWayAbeona TherapeuticsEisaiJazz PharmaceuticalsPatient-Centered Outcomes Research InstituteWashington University in St. LouisDenali TherapeuticsPediatric Epilepsy Research FoundationChild Neurology FoundationNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesBeyond Batten Disease FoundationBiogenBatten Disease Support and Research Association
KeywordsNeurologyPandemicMedicineInclusion (mineral)Pediatric NeurologyClinical trialHealth careHealth equityWorkforcePublic healthFamily medicineDiseasePsychologyPolitical scienceCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PediatricsNursingPsychiatryInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.097
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.091
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score0.511

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0970.091
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0070.005
Science and technology studies0.0090.012
Scholarly communication0.0240.016
Open science0.0040.016
Research integrity0.0130.020
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.153
GPT teacher head0.429
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric NeurologySame topicAdolescent and Pediatric HealthcareFrench-language works237,207