MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3080466714 · doi:10.1016/j.molp.2020.08.011

Mobilizing Crop Biodiversity

2020· article· en· W3080466714 on OpenAlexaff
Susan R. McCouch, Zahra-Katy Navabi, Michael Abberton, Noelle L. Anglin, Rosa Lía Barbieri, Michaël Baum, Kirstin E. Bett, Helen Booker, Gerald L. Brown, Glenn J. Bryan, Luigi Cattivelli, David Charest, Kellye Eversole, Marcelo Freitas, Kioumars Ghamkhar, Dário Grattapaglia, Robert J Henry, Maria Cleria Valadares Inglis, Tofazzal Islam, Zakaria Kehel, Paul Kersey, Graham J.W. King, Stephen Kresovich, Emily Marden, Sean Mayes, Marie-Noëlle Ndjiondjop, Henry T. Nguyen, Samuel Rezende Paiva, Roberto Papa, Peter W.B. Phillips, Awais Rasheed, Christopher M. Richards, Mathieu Rouard, M. J. A. M. Sampaio, Uwe Scholz, Paul D. Shaw, Brad Sherman, S. Evan Staton, Nils Stein, Jan T. Svensson, Mark Tester, José Francisco Montenegro Valls, Rajeev K. Varshney, S. Visscher, Eric von Wettberg, Robbie Waugh, Peter Wenzl, Loren H. Rieseberg

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Plant · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGenetically Modified Organisms Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia HospitalGenome PrairieUniversity of SaskatchewanGenome British ColumbiaGlobal Institute for Water SecurityUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Guelph
FundersCrop TrustBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilConsortium of International Agricultural Research Centers
KeywordsBiologyBiodiversityCropAgroforestryBiotechnologyAgronomyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations92
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueMolecular PlantSame topicGenetically Modified Organisms ResearchFrench-language works237,207