MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3080497169 · doi:10.1101/2020.08.19.20178434

Estimating healthcare resource needs for COVID-19 patients in Nigeria

2020· preprint· en· W3080497169 on OpenAlexaff
Adeteju Ogunbameru, Kali Barrett, A.E. Joda, Yasín A. Khan, Petros Pechlivanoglou, Stephen Mac, David Naimark, Raphael Ximenes, Beate Sander

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicCOVID-19 epidemiological studies
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentreInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesSickKids FoundationUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersXenios
KeywordsHealth carePandemicResource (disambiguation)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Public healthBusinessTime horizonHealthcare systemMedicineMedical emergencyEconomic growthEconomicsComputer scienceNursingDiseaseFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Predicting potential healthcare resource use under different scenarios will help to prepare the healthcare system for a surge in COVID-19 patients. In this study, we aim to predict the effect of COVID-19 on hospital resources in Nigeria. Method We adopted a previously published discrete-time, individual-level, health-state transition model of symptomatic COVID-19 patients to the Nigerian healthcare system and COVID-19 epidemiology. We simulated different combined scenarios of epidemic trajectories and acute care capacity. Primary outcomes included expected cumulative number of cases, days until depletion resources, and number of deaths associated with resource constraints. Outcomes were predicted over a 60-day time horizon. Results In our best-case epidemic trajectory, which implies successful implementation of public health measures to control COVID-19 spread, the current number of ventilator resources in Nigeria (conservative resources scenario), were expended within five days, and 901 patients may die while waiting for hospital resources in conservative resource scenario. In our expanded resource scenarios, ventilated ICU beds were depleted in all three epidemic trajectories within 60 days. Acute care resources were only sufficient in the best-case and intermediate epidemic scenarios, combined with a substantial increase in healthcare resources. Conclusion Current hospital resources are inadequate to manage the COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria. Given Nigeria’s limited resources, it is imperative to increase healthcare resources and maintain aggressive public health measures to reduce COVID-19 transmission. KEY QUESTIONS What is already known on this subject? While western countries seem to be recovering from the COVID-19 pandemic, there is an increasing community spread of the virus in many African countries. The limited healthcare resources available in the region may not be sufficient to cope with increasing numbers of COVID-19 cases. What this study adds? Using the COVID-19 Resource Estimator (CORE) model, we demonstrate that implementing and maintaining aggressive public health measures to keep the epidemic growth at a low rate, while simultaneously substantially increasing healthcare resources is critical to minimize the impact of COVID-19 on morbidity and mortality. The impact of COVID-19 in low resource settings will likely overwhelm health system capacity if aggressive public health measures are not implemented. To mitigate the impact of COVID-19 in these settings, it is essential to develop strategies to substantially increase health system capacities, including hospital resources, personal protective equipment and trained healthcare personnel and to implement and maintain aggressive public health measures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.328
GPT teacher head0.458
Teacher spread0.131 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicCOVID-19 epidemiological studies→French-language works237,207→