MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3080641768 · doi:10.1109/tii.2020.3019386

Reinforcement Learning Enabled Dynamic Resource Allocation in the Internet of Vehicles

2020· article· en· W3080641768 on OpenAlex
Hongbin Liang, Xiaohui Zhang, Xintao Hong, Zongyuan Zhang, Mushu Li, Guangdi Hu, Fen Hou

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of China Stem Cell and Translational ResearchScience and Technology Development FundNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsReinforcement learningComputer scienceResource allocationThe InternetReservationResource management (computing)Quality of serviceMarkov decision processDistributed computingComputer networkMarkov processArtificial intelligenceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As an important application scenario of the industrial Internet of things, the Internet of Vehicles can significantly improve road safety, improve traffic management efficiency, and improve people's travel experience. Due to the high dynamics of the Internet of vehicles environment, the traditional resource optimization technologies cannot meet the requirements of the Internet of vehicles for dynamic communication, computing and storage resources optimization management, and artificial intelligence algorithms can adaptively obtain dynamic resource allocation schemes through self-learning. Therefore, adopting artificial intelligence techniques to optimize the dynamic resource of the Internet of Vehicles is the research focus of this article. In this article, we first model the Internet of Vehicles resource allocation problem as a semi-Markov decision process that introduces a resource reservation strategy and a secondary resource allocation mechanism. Then, the reinforcement learning algorithm is used to solve the model. Thereafter, it theoretically analyzes the joint optimization of computing and communication resources, models it as a hierarchical architecture, and uses hierarchical reinforcement learning to obtain the optimal system resource allocation plan. Finally, the results of simulation experiments show that the dynamic resource allocation scheme of the Internet of vehicles based on the reinforcement learning in this article greatly improve resource utilization and user quality of experience with guaranteeing system quality of service compared with the traditional greedy algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.664
Threshold uncertainty score0.535

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it