MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3080645867 · doi:10.22374/jeleu.v3i3.95

Patient Experience: Living with Cystinuria During the COVID-19 Pandemic

2020· article· en· W3080645867 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ramandeep Chalokia, Francesca Kum, Niamh Foran, Kay Thomas, Matthew Bultitude

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Endoluminal Endourology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrological Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCystinuriaCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PandemicMedical prescriptionPharmacyPediatricsSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Emergency departmentEconomic shortageFamily medicineInternal medicinePsychiatryDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Objectives Cystinuria is a rare genetic cause of recurrent urolithiasis and requires multimodal treatment, and stringent follow up. We wanted to evaluate the fears and concerns of patients with cystinuria during the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods An online survey using Google Forms was emailed to 165 patients with cystinuria who are maintained on a prospective database and had previously consented for email correspondence. Results Fifty-five responses were received following a single invitation, 23 were men and 32 women with a median age of 43 (range: 18-72) years. Thirty-nine (70.9%) out of 55 were isolating during the COVID-19 pandemic although only 7(12.7%) were given specific advice to shield officially. Six (10.9%) reported having COVID or COVID like symptoms, but none reported having a positive test. Only 9 (16.4%) had been able to work as usual. In comparison, 20 (36.4%) were able to work from home. Ten out of 19 patients (52.6%) on chelating medication described difficulty in access to their medicine, either due to a shortage at the pharmacy or prescription access. Reassuringly 34 (61.8%) patients described no issues with access to any of their cystinuria medications. Twenty-two patients (40%) reported experiencing pain or passing a stone during the COVID-19 pandemic, while 30 (54.5%) reported no problems. Of patients who felt it applicable, 16/31 (51.6%) were worried about attending the Emergency Department during this time. Of patients who had scheduled hospital appointments during this time, 26/44 (59.1%) had experienced cancellations. The majority of the respondents (37 (67.3%)) did not state any difference in the ability to stay hydrated during the lockdown. Twenty-eight (50.9%) were more anxious about their overall health during the pandemic, and 20 (36.4%) had expressed more concern about their kidney stones. Conclusion This personal fully patient-reported snapshot of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on a population of cystine stone formers in the United Kingdom has highlighted additional challenges for patients with a rare disease. The lockdown measures enforced have had a varying effect on patients’ ability to work as normal, access medications, health anxieties, in addition to cancellations of the planned hospital appointments and Emergency Department attendance, which will impact on their future health and pose evolving challenges in delivery of their future care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.157
Threshold uncertainty score0.454

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Endoluminal EndourologySame topicUrological Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207