MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3080646774 · doi:10.1039/d0nr03878d

Digital counting of nucleic acid targets using solid-state nanopores

2020· article· en· W3080646774 on OpenAlexafffund
Eric Beamish, Vincent Tabard‐Cossa, Michel Godin

Bibliographic record

VenueNanoscale · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsNanoporeNucleic acidSolid-stateNanostructureNanotechnologyNucleic acid quantitationMaterials scienceNanoscopic scaleBiological systemChemistryBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Assays targeting biomarkers for the early diagnosis of disease demand a sensing platform with a high degree of specificity and sensitivity. In this work, we developed and characterized a solid-state nanopore-based sensing assay for the detection of short nucleic acid targets with readily customizable nanostructured DNA probe sets. We explored the electrical signatures of three DNA nanostructures to determine their performance as probe sets in a digital counting scheme to quantify the concentration of targets. With these probes, we demonstrate the specific, simultaneous detection of two different DNA targets in a 2-plex assay, and separately that of microRNA-155, a biomarker linked to various human cancers. In addition to specific target detection, our scheme demonstrated the ability to quantify at least six different microRNA concentrations. These results highlight the potential for solid-state nanopores as single-molecule counters for future digital diagnostic technologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.821

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNanoscaleSame topicNanopore and Nanochannel Transport StudiesFrench-language works237,207