MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W308069672

Signal and noise in perceptual learning

2001· dissertation· en· W308069672 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jason M. Gold

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace (University of Toronto) · 2001
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of TorontoGovernment of Canada
KeywordsPerceptionNoise (video)Speech recognitionPerceptual learningSIGNAL (programming language)Computer sciencePsychologyAcousticsArtificial intelligencePhysicsNeuroscience
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Performance in perceptual tasks often improves with practice.This effect is known as 'perceptual leaming', and it has been the source of great interest and debate over the course of the last century.Aithough much is known about how percephal leaming changes the properties of cortical circuitry, littie is known about how these changes manifest themselves at the level of behavior.in this thesis, the behaviorai effects of percephiai leaming are considered within the context of signal detection theory.Within a signal detection fnunework, an observer's sensitivity in a percepnial task is defined by the ratio of signai-to-noise within the systern.Thus, accordhg to signal detection theory, the improvements that take place with perceptual leaming can be due to increases in internai signai srrength or decreases in h t e d noise.These quantities m o t be measured drectly.Instead, psychophysical techniques must be used to infer their magnitudes.in this thesis, two psychophysical techniques were used to discriminate between the effects of signal and noise as observes leamed to identay sets of unfamiliar visual patterns.Noise mmkxng was med to me-observers' equivaient input noire and iu c a k u k h ~t efficiencrF quantitb thatcorrespond ta intemal noise and intemal sigpal strength, respectively, within the context of a simple black-box mode1 of the visual system.Equivalent input noise only reflects the effects of an internal noise whose magnitude is independent of the magnitude of the stimulus.Response conslstency was used io estimate the effect of learning on internal noise that depends on the magnitude of the stimulus.Calculation efficiency improved by as much as a factor of four across learning sessions for two very different pattern identification tasks (face and texture ideniification).However.neither form of internai noise changed signifxcantl y with lezrning.These resdts were used to test the prediction that an observer's cdculation should become more similar to the calculation of an ideal discriminator with practice.Response ciassification was w d io estimate observers' linear templates as learning twk place, and showed observer's calculations became significaritly more correlated with the ideal template with practice.Taken together, these results place new theoretical constraints on models of percephial leaming.First and forernost, I wodd ke to thank Patrick J. B e ~e

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace (University of Toronto)Same topicNeural Networks and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207