MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3080706473 · doi:10.1139/cjes-2020-0092

Inversion of magnetic and frequency-domain electromagnetic data for investigating lithologies associated with gold mineralization in the Canadian Malartic area, Québec, Canada

2020· article· en· W3080706473 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Mehrdad Darijani, Colin G. Farquharson

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyDioriteMaficGeochemistryVolcanic rockPlutonPetrologyLithologyGreenstone beltUltramafic rockArcheanMagnetic susceptibilityMagnetic anomalyGabbroVolcanoIgneous rockGeophysicsSeismologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canadian Malartic is an Archean low-grade bulk tonnage native gold deposit. The deposit is mostly located in altered clastic metasedimentary rocks, mafic–ultramafic dykes, and monzodioritic porphyry intrusions. Airborne magnetic and frequency-domain electromagnetic (EM) data were inverted to reconstruct the geological units associated with the mineralization, especially the intrusive masses. The 3-D inversion of magnetic data, which used a tetrahedral mesh to a depth of 2.4 km, shows that mafic volcanic rocks and iron formation rocks extend to depth in the area, more so than diabase dykes. The magnetic inversion also shows that the diorite and monzodiorite rocks of the Lac Fournière A pluton are dipping toward the south on its northern edge at the contact with the metasedimentary rocks. The 1-D inversion of the frequency-domain EM data, for both electrical conductivity and magnetic susceptibility, is able to reconstruct geological structures to a depth of approximately 100 m, providing more details and information about these features. The intrusive masses such as diabase dykes, diorite and monzodiorite rocks, and mafic volcanic rocks are reconstructed as electrically conductive structures in the inversion results. The metasedimentary rocks are resistive, and the overburden is conductive in most of the area. The geophysical data and inversion results suggest the presence of some features (such as diabase dykes and monzodiorite rocks) that are not yet present on some parts of the geology map. A comparison of the EM-derived susceptibility and the magnetic-derived susceptibility over the iron formations can reveal the effect of remanent magnetization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth SciencesSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207