MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3080751665 · doi:10.1055/s-0040-1707351

Diastereoselective Synthesis of Alkylated 1,4-Cyclohexadiene Esters Using Epimeric Pyrroloimidazolones

2020· article· en· W3080751665 on OpenAlexafffund
Costa Metallinos, Ngan K. Tran, Dusty Cadwallader

Bibliographic record

VenueSynthesis · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Synthetic Organic Chemistry
Canadian institutionsBrock University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryAlkylationEpimerDiastereomerRacemizationStereochemistryAnisoleEnantiomerSpecific rotationChiral auxiliaryEnantioselective synthesisOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A pair of ortho-benzoate esters containing epimeric pyrroloimidazolones undergo sequential Birch reduction and diastereoselective alkylation to provide products ranging from 88:12 to >95:5 diastereomeric ratio (dr) for the syn-epimer, and 50:50 to 95:5 dr for the anti-epimer. The stereochemistry of the products is confirmed by a combination of X-ray crystallography on a key anti-epimer-derived product, in combination with specific rotation measurements of enantiomers that are prepared from the syn or anti starting materials. A diastereomerically pure allyl-substituted substrate is shown to undergo Cope rearrangement, which transposes the quaternary chiral center to a remote position without racemization. This work is complementary to asymmetric reductive alkylation reported previously by Schultz using anisole substrates with chiral benzamide auxiliaries in that the pyrroloimidazolones act as surrogates for the methoxy group.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSynthesisSame topicAdvanced Synthetic Organic ChemistryFrench-language works237,207