MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3080756392 · doi:10.1111/jon.12917

Neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging in a rodent model of acute mild traumatic brain injury

2021· article· en· W3080756392 on OpenAlex
Patrick McCunn, Xiaoyun Xu, Alexander J. Moszczynski, Alex Li, Arthur Brown, Robert Bartha

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuroimaging · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorpus callosumFractional anisotropyDiffusion MRIMedicineTraumatic brain injuryHippocampusRodent modelAnalysis of varianceGlial fibrillary acidic proteinPathologyNeuriteHippocampal formationNeuroscienceMagnetic resonance imagingInternal medicinePsychologyImmunohistochemistryBiologyRadiologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Identification of changesin brain microstructure following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) could be instrumental in understanding the underlying pathophysiology. The purpose of this study was to apply neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) to a rodent model of mTBI to determine whether microstructural changes could be detected immediately following injury. METHODS: ). Nine animals experienced a single closed head controlled cortical impact followed by NODDI from 1 to 4 h post injury. Region of interest analysis focused on the corpus callosum and hippocampus. A mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine statistically significant interactions in neurite density index (NDI), orientation dispersion index (ODI), fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (AD), and radial diffusivity. Follow up repeated-measures ANOVAs were used to determine individual changes over time. RESULTS: NDI showed a significant increase in the hippocampus and corpus callosum following injury, while ODI showed increases in the corpus callosum. No significant changes were observed in the sham control animals. No changes were found in FA, MD, AD, or RD. Histological analysis revealed increased glial fibrillary acidic protein staining relative to controls in both the hippocampus and corpus callosum, with evidence of activated astrocytes in these regions. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in NODDI metrics were detected as early as 1 h following mTBI. No changes were detected with conventional diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metrics, suggesting that NODDI provides greater sensitivity to microstructural changes than conventional DTI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.690
Threshold uncertainty score0.447

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it