MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3080764600 · doi:10.7202/1070977ar

Mobiliser les méthodes mixtes pour mieux comprendre les parcours de vie des femmes sans enfant

2020· article· fr· W3080764600 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Emmanuelle Turcotte

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches sociographiques · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Policies and Family
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’absence d’enfant dans la vie des femmes résulte de l’interaction de multiples facteurs sur les plans familial, scolaire, conjugal et professionnel, entre autres. Cette étude démontre l’apport des méthodes mixtes pour explorer la multidimensionnalité des parcours de vie des femmes sans enfant. Elle mobilise l’analyse séquentielle de données d’enquête (sequence analysis) ainsi que l’analyse qualitative thématique d’entretiens semi-directifs auprès de non-mères québécoises nées entre 1947 et 1956. Cette stratégie méthodologique débouche sur une typologie compréhensive de quatre parcours de vie différents présentant chacun une imbrication particulière des trajectoires scolaire, conjugale et professionnelle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.058
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.083
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.308

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0580.083
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0090.007
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0070.007
Open science0.0030.007
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.285
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.126 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches sociographiquesSame topicSocial Policies and FamilyFrench-language works237,207