Exode, colonie, révolution : Machiavel, Spinoza et la démocratie originaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À partir d’une citation implicite des Discours sur la première décade de Tite-Live de Machiavel dans le Tractatus politicus, nous voudrions montrer que l’idée spinozienne de démocratie est aporétique, car les stratégies que Spinoza propose afin d’établir un régime démocratique paraissent entrer en conflit avec son ontologie de la conservation. En même temps, nous pensons que le vide laissé par l’absence de la partie spécifiquement consacrée à la démocratie dans le Tractatus politicus peut être l’occasion, pour le lecteur de Spinoza, de repenser la politique comme un art de comprendre et de gérer les conflits sociaux plutôt que de les neutraliser. Vu sous cet angle, la démocratie, chez Spinoza, est la manifestation de la conflictualité naturelle de la société, une demande d’égalité entre les hommes qui conduit à une remise en question permanente des droits et de la propriété privée ainsi que de toute forme étatique institutionnalisée.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".