Chatbot Analytics Based on Question Answering System and Deep Learning: Case Study for Movie Smart Automatic Answering
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Question Answer (QA) systems are established to retrieves accurate and concise answers to human queries posted in natural language. The primary focus of the QA system is to achieve efficient and natural interaction between machines and humans. To achieve the above several researchers are directed towards Natural Language Processing (NLP) based deep learning. With the rise of a variety of deep NLP models, it is now possible to obtain a vector form of words and sentences that stores the meaning of the context. NLP considerably aids deep learning-based mathematical models in understanding the semantic and syntax of natural human language. The Cornell Movie-Dialogs Corpus created at Cornell University, and Movie Dialog Dataset created at Facebook are preprocessed and used to train the chatbot. Deep learning model has been built to answer questions about movies from Moview reviews. The encoder and decoder of the Seq2Seq model comprise of LSTM cells and are defined using Bidirectional Dynamic RNN and Dynamic Decoder RNN package of the tensor flow library. Additionally, to ensure the chatbot performs well on long sentences attention mechanism from the tensor flow library is applied to the decoder. In this paper, research is conducted on build a smart chatbots based QA system that employs a deep learning model. The deep learning model employs a sequence-to-sequence (Seq2Seq) word embedding that was proposed by Ilya Sutskever in 2014, which had laid the foundation for building chatbot model build in this paper.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".