EVALUATION OF UNet AND UNet++ ARCHITECTURES IN HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGE CHANGE DETECTION APPLICATIONS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. Change detection applications from satellite imagery can be a very useful tool in monitoring human activities and understanding their interaction with the physical environment. In the past few years most of the recent research approaches to automatic change detection have been based on the application of Deep Learning techniques and especially on variations of Convolutional Neural Network architectures due to their great representational capacity and their state-of-the-art performance in visual tasks such as image classification and semantic segmentation. In this work we train and evaluate two CNN architectures, UNet and UNet++, on a change detection task using Very High-Resolution satellite images collected at two different time epochs. We also examine and analyse the effect of two different loss functions, a combination of the Binary Cross Entropy Loss with the Dice Loss, and the Lovász Hinge loss, both of which were specifically designed for semantic segmentation applications. Finally, we experiment with the use of data augmentation as well as deep supervision techniques to evaluate and quantify their contribution in the final classification performance of the different network architectures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it