New Formulas of Ergodic Feedback Capacity of AGN Channels Driven by Stable and Unstable Autoregressive Noise
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper we characterize the feedback capacity of Additive Gaussian Noise (AGN) channels driven by stable and unstable autoregressive noise, for time-invariant feedback codes (channel input distributions). For stable (resp. unstable) channel noise we identify necessary and sufficient conditions for the optimal input process to induce asymptotic stationarity and ergodicity of the channel output (resp. innovations) process. We call this the ergodic feedback capacity. From our characterization follows the surprising result: for a time-invariant unit memory Gaussian autoregressive noise AR(c), c ∈ (-∞, ∞), (i) feedback does not increase capacity for the region with c ∈ (-1, 1) and certain unstable c, and total transmit power κ ∈ [0,%), and (ii) feedback increases capacity for the compliment of the region of values of (c, κ), not covered in (i).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".