Functional Conductive Hydrogels for Bioelectronics
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Conductive hydrogels are widely used in various applications, such as artificial skin, flexible and implantable bioelectronics, and tissue engineering. However, it is still a challenge to formulate hydrogels with high electrical conductivity without compromising their physicochemical properties (e.g., toughness, stretchability, and biocompatibility). Additionally, incorporating other functions, such as self-healing, shape memory, and wet adhesion, into conductive hydrogels is critical to many practical applications of hydrogel bioelectronics. In this Review, we highlight recent progress in the development of functional conductive hydrogels. We, then, discuss the potential applications and challenges faced by conductive hydrogels in the areas of wearable/implantable electronics and cell/tissue engineering. Conductive hydrogel can serve as an important building block for bioelectronic devices in personalized healthcare and other bioengineering areas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it