MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3080932060 · doi:10.3968/11722

Development Value and Path Selection of Kindergarten Curriculum Resources of Tibetan Traditional Culture

2020· article· en· W3080932060 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ou Peng, Liuji Wu, Lu Miao, Lunjie Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueCross-cultural communication · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChild Development and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumConstructiveValue (mathematics)Atmosphere (unit)SociologySelection (genetic algorithm)Curriculum developmentPedagogyMathematics educationPsychologyGeographyComputer scienceProcess (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is an important field of preschool education study to carry out the kindergarten curriculum that conform to the local and that are suitable for children’s physical and mental development. Tibetan traditional culture is the sum of the material wealth and spiritual wealth that are created by Tibetan people in a unique geographical and cultural environment, which has unique regional characteristics and life atmosphere. It is an important part of the Chinese traditional culture, which has constructive value for the development of early childhood curriculum, identify value and inherit value. Based on the traditional Tibetan culture, the development of preschool curriculum resources should adopt the strategy of clarifying the concept of preschool curriculum, following the principles of living and playing, and adhering to the cooperative development of home, developing related courses and constructing the curriculum system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCross-cultural communicationSame topicChild Development and EducationFrench-language works237,207