MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3080932060 · doi:10.3968/11722

Development Value and Path Selection of Kindergarten Curriculum Resources of Tibetan Traditional Culture

2020· article· en· W3080932060 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCross-cultural communication · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChild Development and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumConstructiveValue (mathematics)Atmosphere (unit)SociologySelection (genetic algorithm)Curriculum developmentPedagogyMathematics educationPsychologyGeographyComputer scienceProcess (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is an important field of preschool education study to carry out the kindergarten curriculum that conform to the local and that are suitable for children’s physical and mental development. Tibetan traditional culture is the sum of the material wealth and spiritual wealth that are created by Tibetan people in a unique geographical and cultural environment, which has unique regional characteristics and life atmosphere. It is an important part of the Chinese traditional culture, which has constructive value for the development of early childhood curriculum, identify value and inherit value. Based on the traditional Tibetan culture, the development of preschool curriculum resources should adopt the strategy of clarifying the concept of preschool curriculum, following the principles of living and playing, and adhering to the cooperative development of home, developing related courses and constructing the curriculum system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.633
Threshold uncertainty score0.457

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it