MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3080977465 · doi:10.2118/200409-ms

Instow a Full Field, Multi-Patterned Alkaline-Surfactant-Polymer Flood – Analyses and Comparison of Phases 1 and 2

2020· article· en· W3080977465 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOil in placePhase (matter)Pulmonary surfactantVolume (thermodynamics)PolymerOil fieldEnhanced oil recoveryChromatographyChemistryPetroleum engineeringAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Materials sciencePetroleumGeologyOrganic chemistryThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract An Alkaline-Surfactant-Polymer (ASP) project in the Instow field, Upper Shaunavon formation in Saskatchewan Canada was planned in three phases. The first two multi -well pattern phases are nearing completion. Beginning in 2007, an ASP solution was injected into Phase 1. Phase 1 polymer drive injection began in 2011 after injection of 35% pore volume (PV) ASP solution. Coincident with the polymer drive injection into Phase 1, Phase 2 ASP solution injection began. Phase 2 polymer drive began in 2016 after injection of 47% PV ASP solution. Polymer drive continues in both phases with Phase 1 and Phase 2 injected volume being 55% PV and 35% PV, respectively. Phase 1 and Phase 2 oil cut response to ASP injection showed an increase of approximately four times from 3.5% to 12 to 16% and an increase in oil rate from approximately 3,200 m3/m (20,000 bbl/m) to 8,300 m3/m (52,000 bbl/m) in Phase 1 and from 2,200 m3/m (14,000 bbl/m) to 7,800 m3/m (49,000 bbl/m) in Phase 2. Phase 1 pattern analysis indicates the pore volumes of ASP solution injected varied from 13% to 54% PV of ASP with oil recovery percentage increasing with increasing injected volume. Oil recoveries in the different patterns ranged from 3% OOIP up to 21% OOIP with lower oil recoveries correlating with lower volume of ASP injected. The response from some of the patterns correlates with coreflood results. Wells in common to the two phases show increase oil cut and oil rate responses to chemical injection from both Phases 1 and 2. Oil recovery as of August 2019 is 60% OOIP for Phase 1 and 57% OOIP for Phase 2. Phase 1 economic analysis indicated chemical and operation cost would be approximately C$26/bbl resulting in the decision to move forward with Phase 2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.208
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it