MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Endometrial Ablation or Resection Versus Levonorgestrel Intra-uterine System for the Treatment of Women With Heavy Menstrual Bleeding and a Normal Uterine Cavity: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis

2020· review· en· W3081008315 on OpenAlexaff
C Bergeron, Philippe Y. Laberge, Amélie Boutin, Marie-Anne Thériault, Florence Valcourt, Madeleine Lemyre, Sarah Maheux‐Lacroix

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetrical & Gynecological Survey · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUterine Myomas and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCentre hospitalier universitaire de QuébecUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLevonorgestrelUterine cavityEndometrial ablationUterine bleedingGynecologyHysteroscopyMenstrual bleedingMetrorrhagiaSexual functionMeta-analysisObstetricsAblationUterusPopulationFamily planningInternal medicineResearch methodology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

(Abstracted from Hum Reprod Update 2020;26:302–311) One of the most common gynecological conditions, abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), affects approximately 30% of women throughout their reproductive lifetime. Abnormal uterine bleeding has a significant impact on quality of life and sexual function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.015
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.175
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueObstetrical & Gynecological SurveySame topicUterine Myomas and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207