Automated Channel Selection in High-Density sEMG for Improved Force Estimation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurate and real-time estimation of force from surface electromyogram (EMG) signals enables a variety of applications. We developed and validated new approaches for selecting subsets of high-density (HD) EMG channels for improved and lower-dimensionality force estimation. First, a large dataset was recorded from a number of participants performing isometric contractions in different postures, while simultaneously recording HD-EMG channels and ground-truth force. The EMG signals were acquired from three linear surface electrode arrays, each with eight monopolar channels, and were placed on the long head and short head of the biceps brachii and brachioradialis. After data collection and pre-processing, fast orthogonal search (FOS) was employed for force estimation. To select a subset of channels, principal component analysis (PCA) in the frequency domain and a novel index called the power-correlation ratio (PCR), which maximizes the spectral power while minimizing similarity to other channels, were used. These approaches were compared to channel selection using time-domain PCA. We selected one, two, and three channels per muscle from the original seven differential channels to reduce the redundancy and correlation in the dataset. In the best case, we achieved an approximate improvement of 30% for force estimation while reducing the dimensionality by 57% for a subset of three channels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".