Influencing Parameters on Discharge Bearing Currents in Inverter-Fed Induction Motors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article investigates discharge bearing currents in inverter-fed electric motors. Industrial reports indicate that among prevalent bearing failures, bearing currents are one of the influent drivers leading to a variety of tribological issues and premature wear in bearings. While the root-causes of bearing currents have been extensively reported over the years, the response of bearing under voltage stress and the factors that influence bearing endangerment through electric discharges have been far less studied. An online measurement of the bearing voltage is proposed on a motor test-bench to estimate both the discharge activity and the energy of the discharges. The designed test bed allows reproduction of representative bearing currents leading to electrical micropitting. This paper presents extensive measurements results that highlight the critical operating conditions and parameters that worsen the discharge phenomenon inside bearings. Testing protocols are performed to quantify the influence of each parameter separately. While the bearing voltage magnitude play a significant role in the discharge phenomenon, other parameters such as successive startups, bearing temperature, and type of grease deserve appropriate investigations to avoid or mitigate the well-known shortened bearing life under inverter operation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".