MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3081112506 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2020-0311

Glow discharge excited at low to high radio frequencies around active dipoles in the ionosphere

2020· article· en· W3081112506 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
H. G. James, A. W. Yau

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPlasma Diagnostics and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryNatural Resources Canada
FundersCanadian Space AgencyNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsPhysicsIonosphereSounding rocketDipoleElectric fieldPayload (computing)Radio frequencyElectronAtomic physicsIonizationIonElectrical engineeringAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present the first space-borne observation of optical emissions of both neutral and ionized argon atoms resulting from a radio-frequency glow discharge (RF-GD) from a sounding rocket payload. The Observations of Electric-field Distributions in the Ionospheric Plasma — a Unique Strategy-C (OEDIPUS-C) payload was designed to separate into two sub-payloads on its up-leg. This separation permitted a number of two-point measurements, including those on radio wave propagation from the active dipole antennas on the upper sub-payload to the synchronized receiving dipoles on the lower sub-payload. A white-light video camera on the lower sub-payload recorded strong luminosity around the active dipoles during the first 15 s after sub-payload separation, when argon gas jets were providing propulsion to separate the two sub-payloads. Parts of the ejected argon appeared as a glowing volume where the large radio-frequency (RF) fields from the two active dipoles excited the optical emission, as the sub-payload separation increased from 2 to 55 m. The shape and intensity of the luminosity were well repeated as a function of the swept frequency (0.025–8.000 MHz), but their frequency dependences were distinctly different from those of sounder-accelerated electrons measured onboard, and deduced to result from the nonlinearity of the glow discharge. The observation is to our knowledge the first of its kind, and is interpreted in terms of a RF-GD energized by the strong near electric fields of the transmitting dipoles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicPlasma Diagnostics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207