Low-Cost Multispectral Sensor Array for Determining Leaf Nitrogen Status
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A crop’s health can be determined by its leaf nutrient status; more precisely, leaf nitrogen (N) level, is a critical indicator that carries a lot of worthwhile nutrient information for classifying the plant’s health. However, the existing non-invasive techniques are expensive and bulky. The aim of this study is to develop a low-cost, quick-read multi-spectral sensor array to predict N level in leaves non-invasively. The proposed sensor module has been developed using two reflectance-based multi-spectral sensors (visible and near-infrared (NIR)). In addition, the proposed device can capture the reflectance data at 12 different wavelengths (six for each sensor). We conducted the experiment on canola leaves in a controlled greenhouse environment as well as in the field. In the greenhouse experiment, spectral data were collected from 87 leaves of 24 canola plants, subjected to varying levels of N fertilization. Later, 42 canola cultivars were subjected to low and high nitrogen levels in the field experiment. The k-nearest neighbors (KNN) algorithm was employed to model the reflectance data. The trained model shows an average accuracy of 88.4% on the test set for the greenhouse experiment and 79.2% for the field experiment. Overall, the result concludes that the proposed cost-effective sensing system can be viable in determining leaf nitrogen status.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".