Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes Signature as a New Pan-Cancer Predictive Biomarker of Anti PD-1/PD-L1 Efficacy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tumor immune infiltrates are associated with tumor prognosis in many cancer types. However, their capacity to predict the efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors is poorly documented. We generate three signatures that evaluate in different ways these infiltrates: lymphoid- and myeloid-alone signatures, and a combined signature of both named the TIL (tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte) transcriptomic signature. We evaluate these signatures in The Cancer Genome Atlas Program (TCGA) Pan-Cancer cohort and four cohorts comprising patients with melanoma, lung, and head and neck cancer treated with anti-PD-1 or anti-CTLA-4 therapies. We observe using TCGA Pan-Cancer cohort that this TIL or lymphoid-alone signature accurately estimates prognosis in most cancer types and outperforms histological TIL evaluation or myeloid signature alone. Both TIL and lymphoid signatures are correlated with response rate to immunotherapy. Combining lymphoid signature or TIL with tumor mutational burden generates a score that is highly efficient in predicting response to immunotherapy. In different series of patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer, head and neck cancer, and melanoma, we observed that TIL or lymphoid signature were associated with outcome. These data demonstrate that a simple TIL or lymphoid signature could be used as a Pan-Cancer prognostic and predictive biomarker to estimate patient survival under checkpoint inhibitors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".