Optimal Virtual Network Function Deployment for 5G Network Slicing in a Hybrid Cloud Infrastructure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Network virtualization is a key enabler for 5G systems to support the expected use cases of vertical markets. In this context, we study the joint optimal deployment of Virtual Network Functions (VNFs) and allocation of computational resources in a hybrid cloud infrastructure by taking the requirements of the 5G services and the characteristics of the cloud architecture into consideration. The resulting mixed-integer problem is reformulated as an integer linear problem, which can be solved by using a standard solver. Our results underline the advantages of a hybrid infrastructure over a standard cloud radio access network consisting only of a central cloud, and show that the proposed mechanism to deploy VNF chains leads to high resource utilization efficiency and large gains in terms of the number of supported VNF chains. To deal with the computational complexity of optimizing a large number of clouds and VNF chains, we propose a simple low-complexity heuristic that attempts to find a feasible VNF deployment solution with a limited number of functional splits. Numerical results indicate that the performance of the proposed heuristic is close to the optimal one when the edge clouds are well dimensioned with respect to the computational requirements of the 5G services.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".