MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3081284793 · doi:10.3168/jds.2019-18077

3-Nitrooxypropanol supplementation had little effect on fiber degradation and microbial colonization of forage particles when evaluated using the in situ ruminal incubation technique

2020· article· en· W3081284793 on OpenAlexafffund
Xiu Min Zhang, Robert J. Gruninger, Aklilu W. Alemu, Min Wang, Zhi Liang Tan, Maik Kindermann, K. A. Beauchemin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dairy Science · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersYouth Innovation Promotion AssociationDSM Nutritional ProductsYouth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of SciencesAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsRumenSilageForageDry matterAnimal scienceIncubationBiologyNeutral Detergent FiberMethanogenesisHayDigestion (alchemy)ChemistryAgronomyFood scienceBiochemistryFermentationEcologyMethane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3-Nitrooxypropanol (3-NOP) is an investigational compound that acts as an enzyme inhibitor to decrease ruminal methanogenesis. We hypothesized that when feeding 3-NOP to cattle fed a high-forage diet, H 2 would accumulate in the rumen, which could suppress microbial colonization of feed particles and fiber degradation. Therefore, the study investigated the effects of supplementing a high-forage diet with 3-NOP on ruminal fiber degradability and microbial colonization of feed particles using the in situ technique. Eight ruminally cannulated beef cattle were allocated to 2 groups (4 cattle/group) in a crossover design with 2 periods and 2 dietary treatments. The treatments were control (basal diet) and 3-NOP (basal diet supplemented with 3-NOP, 150 mg/kg of dry matter). The basal diet consisted of 45% barley silage, 45% chopped grass hay, and 10% concentrate (dry matter basis). Samples of dried, ground barley silage and grass hay were incubated in the rumen of each animal for 0, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 96, 120, 216, and 288 h to determine neutral detergent fiber (NDF) degradation kinetics. An additional 2 bags were incubated for 4 and 48 h to evaluate the bacterial community attached to the incubated forages. Dietary supplementation of 3-NOP decreased (−53%) the dissolved methane concentration and increased (+780%) the dissolved H 2 concentration in ruminal fluid, but did not substantially alter in situ NDF degradation. The addition of 3-NOP resulted in a decrease in the α-diversity of the microbial community with colonizing communities showing reduced numbers of amplicon sequence variants and phylogenetic diversity compared with control diets. Principal coordinate analysis plots indicated that forages incubated in animals fed 3-NOP resulted in highly specific changes to targeted microbes compared with control diets based on unweighted analysis (considering only absence and presence of taxa), but did not alter the overall composition of the colonizing community based on weighted UniFrac distances; unchanged relative abundances of major taxa included phyla Bacteroidetes , Firmicutes , and Fibrobacteres . The effect of 3-NOP on colonizing methanogenic microbes differed depending upon the forage incubated, as abundance of genus Methanobrevibacter was decreased for barley silage but not for grass hay. In conclusion, 3-NOP supplementation of a high-forage diet decreased ruminal methanogenesis and increased dissolved H 2 concentration, but had no negative effects on ruminal fiber degradation and only minor effects on relative abundances of the major taxa of bacteria adhered to forage substrates incubated in the rumen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dairy ScienceSame topicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207