<i>Chocolate Dandies</i> and the End of Sissle and Blake
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This chapter describes how, after touring, In Bamville arrived in New York in debt and with a new name: Chocolate Dandies; the successful introduction of the dance craze, The Charleston, in Miller and Lyles’s competing show, Runnin’ Wild; the mixed reception and short run of Chocolate Dandies on Broadway; successful reception of comedian Johnny Hudgins and the lawsuit by the show’s producers when he left the show for a better-paying gig. The chapter further examines how the show returned to the road to try to work off its debt; Sissle and Blake’s trouble with the law when they were arrested at an after-party for another touring show in Toronto; their successful tour of England; their return to vaudeville in America; and their appearance in a now-lost Vitaphone short. Then the chapter explores the duo’s breakup over Eubie’s refusal to return to Europe; Eubie’s new partnership with comedian/singer Broadway Jones; their touring of an abbreviated form of Shuffle Along in vaudeville under the name of Shuffle Along Jr.; and other touring work, including appearances with Fanchon and Marco’s revues.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".