MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3081321008 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxaa068.039

40 Duration of Neonatal Oxygen Supplementation Associated with Higher Hemoglobin and Higher Blood Pressure in Young Adults Born Preterm

2020· article· en· W3081321008 on OpenAlexaff
Adrien Flahault, Camille Girard‐Bock, Yves Pastore, Thuy Mai Luu, Anne Monique Nuyt

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBronchopulmonary dysplasiaHemoglobinAnemiaBlood pressureErythropoiesisErythropoietinYoung adultGestational agePediatricsInternal medicineObstetricsPhysiologyPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction/Background Although erythropoiesis is impaired and anemia frequent in neonates born preterm, hematopoiesis in adults born preterm has not been previously studied. We hypothesize that adverse neonatal events durably affect erythropoiesis regulation, leading to a difference in hemoglobin levels in young adults born preterm compared to those born term. Objectives We thus aimed to evaluate hemoglobin and erythropoietin levels in young adults born preterm, to identify neonatal events associated with erythropoiesis in adulthood and to examine the relationships of hemoglobin levels with respiratory function and blood pressure. Design/Methods This study included 101 young adults (ages 18-29 years) born preterm (≤29 weeks of gestation) and 105 full-term controls. We measured office blood pressure using automated oscillometric device, complete blood count, serum erythropoietin levels (ELISA) and pulmonary function test. Group comparisons were performed using Student’s t or Mann-Whitney U tests. Correlations were assessed using Pearson’s coefficient and test. We performed a mediation analysis to assess the relationship between blood pressure, hemoglobin levels and preterm birth. Results Tobacco use and sex adjusted hemoglobin levels were 5.3 (95% CI: 2.9, 7.7) g/L higher in preterm-born individuals compared to controls (Table). We did not observe a difference in erythropoietin levels (7.3±3.4 and 8.12±3.40 U/L in the term and the preterm groups, respectively, p=0.102). Duration of oxygen supplementation in the neonatal period was independently associated with higher hemoglobin levels in the preterm group. In adults born preterm with bronchopulmonary dysplasia, airflow limitation was associated with higher hemoglobin levels. Both systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure were increased in individuals born preterm (p=0.042 and p=0.0008, respectively). Higher hemoglobin levels were associated with higher SBP and DBP, independently of term or preterm status. Mediation analysis (Figure) suggests that hemoglobin increase contributes to 37% and 32% of the effect of preterm birth on SBP and DBP, respectively. Conclusion While erythropoietin levels are similar between groups, hemoglobin levels are higher in young adults born preterm, especially in cases of bronchopulmonary dysplasia and airflow limitation. Hemoglobin increase is associated with elevated blood pressure in this population. Understanding mechanisms of impaired erythropoiesis regulation in adults born preterm will be important in designing antihypertensive approaches specific to this population. Results shown as mean ± SD or medians (25%-75%) and comparisons were performed using Student’s t test or Mann-Whitney U test, when appropriate. Systolic blood pressure (SBP). B. Diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Hb: hemoglobin. ACME: Average Causal Mediation Effect. B: unstandardized regression coefficient. All estimations are adjusted for sex.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research→French-language works237,207→