Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gaussian processes regression models are an appealing machine learning method as they learn expressive nonlinear models from exemplar data with minimal parameter tuning and estimate both the mean and covariance of unseen points. However, cubic computational complexity growth with the number of samples has been a long standing challenge. Training requires the inversion of $N \times N$N×N kernel at every iteration, whereas regression needs computation of an $m \times N$m×N kernel, where $N$N and $m$m are the number of training and test points, respectively. This work demonstrates how approximating the covariance kernel using eigenvalues and functions leads to an approximate Gaussian process with significant reduction in training and regression complexity. Training now requires computing only an $N \times n$N×n eigenfunction matrix and an $n \times n$n×n inverse, where $n$n is a selected number of eigenvalues. Furthermore, regression now only requires an $m \times n$m×n matrix. Finally, in a special case, the hyperparameter optimization is completely independent from the number of training samples. The proposed method can regress over multiple outputs, learn the correlations between them, and estimate their derivatives to any order. The computational complexity reduction, regression capabilities, multioutput correlation learning, and comparison to the state of the art are demonstrated in simulation examples. Finally we show how the proposed approach can be utilized to model real human data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".