MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

New World, Old Problems? Aristocratic Influences on Colonial Governance and Land in Nineteenth-century Atlantic Canada

2020· book-chapter· en· W3081394505 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Annie Tindley

Bibliographic record

VenueEdinburgh University Press eBooks · 2020
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHistorical Economic and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEliteColonialismLandlordCorporate governanceIrishGovernment (linguistics)EmpireGovernorEconomic historyBritish EmpirePolitical sciencePosition (finance)Land tenurePolitical economyHistoryGeographyEconomyPoliticsAgricultureLawSociologyEconomicsArchaeologyManagement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Through the examination of the role of Lord Dufferin, Governor General of Canada during the passage of the Land Purchase Act of 1875, this chapter illustrates how land policy reform in Atlantic Canada was seen through the lens of the imperial concerns of the landholding British elite. Dufferin, an Irish landlord himself, was concerned about the implications of the Government of Canada buying out the land proprietors on PEI for his own holdings as well as those of others in his social position across the empire. The chapter argues that a transnational approach to analysis of such issues reveals the extent to which the landed and aristocratic elite of the British Isles could still exert their influence despite the movement toward colonial self-government.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score0.968

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0170.029
Scholarly communication0.0090.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.165
Teacher spread0.146 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEdinburgh University Press eBooksSame topicHistorical Economic and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207