MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3081419215 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2020.3019376

Wheel Modules With Distributed Controllers: A Multi-Agent Approach to Vehicular Control

2020· article· en· W3081419215 on OpenAlexafffund
Chen Tang, Amir Khajepour

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsModular designChassisRobustness (evolution)Control engineeringModularity (biology)Flexibility (engineering)Distributed computingActuatorVehicle dynamicsComputer scienceControl systemEngineeringArchitectureSoftware portabilityEmbedded systemAutomotive engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modular vehicles have great potential to solve future mobility challenges in an efficient, reliable, and flexible way. Various designs have been proposed for compact, and multi-functional wheel modules. However, the architecture of vehicular active safety systems, by adopting such a modular approach, has not yet been well studied in the literature. Conventional stability control systems are developed in a centralized manner to seek the optimal distribution of control efforts, and the resultant controllers are highly dependent on the vehicle platform. Any changes to the actuators as well as modelling complexity will lead to a system redesign. This paper proposes a distributed control architecture as inspired by the modular chassis design for great re-usability. Each wheel module is treated as an agent in a cooperative game to determine their share in the overall control efforts, while encapsulating their configuration as well as modelling details within each module. Re-configurable agent models are also derived in a weak-coupled fashion to enhance modularity of the control system. The resultant distributed model predictive controller demonstrates greater flexibility in adaption to various configurations as well as enhanced robustness against computational units failure in the system. The proposed architecture also offers a new perspective for the controller design of conventional vehicles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicVehicle Dynamics and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207