Aktivitas Dakwah Komunitas Muslim Bikers Indonesia (KOMBI) Pekanbaru
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tulisan ini menganalisis munculnya Komunitas Muslim Bikers (KOMBI) di Pekanbaru, terutama pada aspek sosial dan gerakan dakwahnya. KOMBI menjadi fenomena baru dalam lanskap dakwah perkotaan. Kajian ini penting dilakukan untuk melihat bagaimana gerakan KOMBI ini melakukan kegiatannya untuk memperkuat otoritasnya di Masyarakat. Secara khusus, artikel ini akan membahas beberapa pertanyaan berikut. Seperti apa konteks kemunculan gerakan Komunitas Muslim Bikers di Pekanbaru? Bagaimana perekrutan dan sistematika kepengurusan Komunitas Muslim Bikers? Di mana saja KOMBI ini tersebar selain di Pekanbaru? Apa saja program-program yang dilakukan komunitas ini? Bagaimana KOMBI merespon kelompok geng motor lainnya yang bukan Islam? Untuk menjawab pertanyaan-pertanyaan ini, penulis melakukan studi lapangan dan didukung dengan literatur yang relevan. Hasil dari kajian tersebut menunjukkan bahwa program-program yang dilakukan Komunitas Muslim Bikers (KOMBI) Pekanbaru merupakan hal positif yang banyak memberikan manfaat bagi masyarakat.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".