MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3081528139 · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.008

The Polygenic and Monogenic Basis of Blood Traits and Diseases

2020· review· en· W3081528139 on OpenAlexaff
Dragana Vuckovic, Erik L. Bao, Parsa Akbari, Caleb A. Lareau, Abdou Mousas, Tao Jiang, Ming‐Huei Chen, Laura M. Raffield, Manuel Tardáguila, Jennifer E. Huffman, Scott C. Ritchie, Karyn Mégy, Hannes Ponstingl, Christopher J. Penkett, Patrick K. Albers, Emilie M. Wigdor, Saori Sakaue, Arden Moscati, Regina Manansala, Ken Sin Lo, Huijun Qian, Masato Akiyama, Traci M. Bartz, Yoav Ben‐Shlomo, Andrew D Beswick, Jette Bork‐Jensen, Erwin P. Böttinger, Jennifer A. Brody, Frank J.A. van Rooij, Kumaraswamy Naidu Chitrala, Peter W.F. Wilson, Hélène Choquet, John Danesh, Emanuele Di Angelantonio, Niki Dimou, Jingzhong Ding, Paul Elliott, Tõnu Esko, Michele K. Evans, Stephan B. Felix, James S. Floyd, Linda Broer, Niels Grarup, Michael H. Guo, Qi Guo, Andreas Greinacher, Jeff Haessler, Torben Hansen, Joanna M. M. Howson, Wei Huang, Eric Jorgenson, Tim Kacprowski, Mika Kähönen, Masahiro Kanai, Savita Karthikeyan, Fotios Koskeridis, Leslie A. Lange, Terho Lehtimäki, Allan Linneberg, Yongmei Liu, Leo‐Pekka Lyytikäinen, Ani Manichaikul, Koichi Matsuda, Karen L. Mohlke, Nina Mononen, Yoshinori Murakami, Girish N. Nadkarni, Kjell Nikus, Nathan Pankratz, Oluf Pedersen, Michael Preuß, Bruce M. Psaty, Olli T. Raitakari, Stephen S. Rich, Blanca Rodríguez, Jonathan D. Rosen, Jerome I. Rotter, Petra Schubert, Cassandra N. Spracklen, Praveen Surendran, Hua Tang, Jean‐Claude Tardif, Mohsen Ghanbari, Uwe Völker, Henry Völzke, Nicholas A. Watkins, Stefan Weiß, Na Cai, Kousik Kundu, Stephen B. Watt, Klaudia Walter, Alan B. Zonderman, Kelly Cho, Yun Li, Ruth J. F. Loos, Julian C. Knight, Michel Georges, Oliver Stegle, Εvangelos Εvangelou, Yukinori Okada, David J. Roberts, Michael Inouye, Andrew D. Johnson, Paul L. Auer, William J. Astle, Alex P. Reiner, Adam S. Butterworth, Willem H. Ouwehand, Guillaume Lettre, Vijay G. Sankaran, Nicole Soranzo

Bibliographic record

VenueCell · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Associations and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMontreal Heart Institute
FundersMedical Research CouncilNational Institutes of HealthNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in ResearchU.S. Department of Veterans AffairsNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchWellcome TrustWorld Health Organization
KeywordsBiologyBiobankGenome-wide association studyGenetic architectureQuantitative trait locusMendelian inheritanceHuman genetic variationGenetic associationPhenotypeHuman geneticsGeneticsAlleleGenetic variationComputational biologyPolygeneEvolutionary biologyGeneSingle-nucleotide polymorphismGenomeGenotypeHuman genome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Blood cells play essential roles in human health, underpinning physiological processes such as immunity, oxygen transport, and clotting, which when perturbed cause a significant global health burden. Here we integrate data from UK Biobank and a large-scale international collaborative effort, including data for 563,085 European ancestry participants, and discover 5,106 new genetic variants independently associated with 29 blood cell phenotypes covering a range of variation impacting hematopoiesis. We holistically characterize the genetic architecture of hematopoiesis, assess the relevance of the omnigenic model to blood cell phenotypes, delineate relevant hematopoietic cell states influenced by regulatory genetic variants and gene networks, identify novel splice-altering variants mediating the associations, and assess the polygenic prediction potential for blood traits and clinical disorders at the interface of complex and Mendelian genetics. These results show the power of large-scale blood cell trait GWAS to interrogate clinically meaningful variants across a wide allelic spectrum of human variation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score0.441

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations743
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCellSame topicGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207