El Covid-19 y la Guerra Invisible: ¿Es el Fin de la Hospitalidad? / Covid and the Invisible War: Is this the End of Hospitality?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RESUMENEl brote del virus conocido como Sars-Cov2 [o coronavirus] ha sido golpe significativo que afirma una tendencia iniciada luego de 2001 a la auto canibalización o fin de la hospitalidad occidental, sino que transforma el propio cuerpo y lo dispone como un arma para atacar al otro. Como ya se ha mencionado, la vieja dicotomía entre el turista deseado como un agente de crecimiento económico y el inmigrante temido como huésped no deseado, da paso a un nuevo paisaje, donde el turista es visto – con cierta sospecha – como un potencial enemigo. Como la guerra contra el cáncer en 1970, la guerra contra el crimen local en los 1990, y la guerra contra el terror en 2001, ahora el mundo vive la guerra contra un virus. En este nuevo mundo, la hospitalidad clásica cede hacia una hospitalidad absoluta donde el hotel se recicla como hospital.PALABRAS CLAVESHospitalidad; Turismo; Coronavirus; Covid19; El fin del Turismo. ABSTRACTThe recent virus outbreak resulted from Sars-Cov2 [coronavirus disease] not only has been a serious blow to the Western social imaginary, likely affirming a tendency ignited just after 2001 to the self-cannibalization – or at the best the end of hospitality as we know it –, but also disposed of the body as a potential killer who affects the public health. As this paper shows, the old dichotomy revolving around a desired tourist who is an agent of wealth production and globalization and the undesired migrant has been blurred. Now the global tourist is widely seen with some mistrust, as a potential enemy who may place the societal order in jeopardy. Like the war against Cancer in 1970s decade, the war against the local crime in the 1980, or the war on terror just after 9/11, now the world has declared the war against a virus. In this new world, the sacred law of hospitality is basically revisited according to the passage from an absolute to an unconditional hospitality [a-la Derrida].KEYWORDSHospitality; Tourism; Coronavirus Disease; Covid19; The End of Tourism. AUTORIAMaximiliano E Korstanje – Doctor. Profesor Universidad de Palermo, Buenos Aires, Argentina, e en la University of Leeds, Leed, Reino Unido. Currículo: https://www.igi-global.com/affiliate/maximiliano-korstanje/332098. E-mail: mkorst@palermo.edu REFERENCIASAmoore, L., Marmura, S. & Salter, M. B. (2008). Smart borders and mobilities: Spaces, zones, enclosures. Surveillance & Society, 5(2), 96-101. LinkAltheide, D. (2018) Terrorism and the Politics of fear. New York, Rowman & Littlefield.Adey, P., Bissell, D., Hannam, K., Merriman, P. & Sheller, M. (Eds.). (2014). The Routledge handbook of mobilities. London: Routledge.Augé, M. (1996). El sentido de los otros: actualidad de la antropología. Madrid, Grupo Planeta (GBS).Augé, M. (1998). Viaje Imposible. Barcelona: Gedisa.Augé, M. (2007). El objeto de la antropología hoy. Psicoperspectivas, 6(1), 9-21. LinkBauman, Z. (2005). Liquid life. Cambridge: Polity Press.Bauman, Z. (2011). Collateral damage: Social inequalities in a global age. Cambridge: Polity Press.Bauman, Z. (2013). Liquid modernity. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Blaut, J. M. (1989). Colonialism and the rise of capitalism. Science & Society, 53(3), 260-296. LinkBryant, J. M. (2006). The West and the rest revisited: Debating capitalist origins, European colonialism, and the advent of modernity. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 31(4), 403-444. LinkBurnham, M. (1999). Captivity & sentiment: cultural exchange in American literature, 1682-1861. London: Dartmouth College Press.Derrida, J., & Dufourmantelle, A. (2000). Of hospitality. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Harris, M. (2001). The rise of anthropological theory: A history of theories of culture. Chesnut Creek: AltaMira Press.Hart, J. (2003). Comparing Empires: European Colonialism from Portuguese Expansion to the Spanish-American War. New York: Springer.Kay, D. A. (1967). The politics of decolonization: The new nations and the United Nations political process. International Organization, 21(4), 786-811. LinkKorstanje, M. (2012). Reconsidering cultural tourism: an anthropologist's perspective. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 7(2), 179-184. LinkKorstanje M (2017). Terrorism, Tourism and the end of hospitality in the West. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Korstanje M (2018a) The Mobilities Paradox: a critical analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Korstanje, M. E. (2018b). The Challenges of democracy in the War on terror: the liberal state before the advance of terrorism. Routledge.Kundnani, A. (2014). The Muslims are coming! Islamophobia, extremism, and the domestic war on terror. London: Verso Trade.Lewis, D. (1973). Anthropology and colonialism. Current Anthropology, 14(5), 581-602. LinkLyon, D. (2001). Surveillance society: Monitoring everyday life. London: McGraw-Hill Education.Palmer, C. A. (1994). Tourism and colonialism: The experience of the Bahamas. Annals of tourism Research, 21(4), 792-811. LinkPels, P. (1997). The anthropology of colonialism: culture, history, and the emergence of western governmentality. Annual review of anthropology, 26(1), 163-183. LinkPratt, M. L. (2007). Imperial eyes: Travel writing and transculturation. New York: Routledge.Santana Talavera, A. (2003). Turismo cultural, culturas turísticas. Horizontes Antropológicos, 9(20), 31-57. LinkStrong, P. T. (2018). Captive selves, captivating others: The politics and poetics of colonial American captivity narratives. Abingdon: Routledge.Virilio, P. (1995). Speed and information: Cyberspace alarm! CTheory, 8-27. LInkVirilio, P. (2005). Desert screen: War at the speed of light. London: A&C Black.Wolfe, P. (1999). Settler colonialism. London: A&C Black. PROCESSO EDITORIAL SEÇÃO ESPECIAL COVID-19Recebido 11 JUN 2020; Aceito 14 JUN 2020.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".