MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3081577637 · doi:10.1002/asmb.2566

On the information properties of working used systems using dynamic signature

2020· article· en· W3081577637 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPredictabilityEntropy (arrow of time)ClosenessInformation theoryKullback–Leibler divergenceDivergence (linguistics)ResidualComputer scienceJoint entropyMathematicsSignature (topology)Applied mathematicsStatistical physicsAlgorithmPrinciple of maximum entropyStatisticsArtificial intelligencePhysicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Shannon entropy is a useful criterion for measuring the uncertainty (predictability) of lifetimes of engineering systems. In this work, we provide an explicit expression for the entropy of the residual lifetime of a working used system with exactly i failed components at time t , using dynamic signature. We also present additional results on bounds and ordering properties for the proposed entropy. We find an expression for the Jensen‐Shannon (JS) divergence of the residual lifetime of a working used system, and show that the JS divergence of the system is equal to that of its dual. An improved bound for the JS divergence is also obtained. Finally, based on the proposed entropy, we introduce a criterion using which we can prefer a system. This criterion, a distribution‐free measure that only depends on the dynamic signature, ranks systems based on their closeness to extreme systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.711
Threshold uncertainty score0.349

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.174
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.092 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it