MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3081590694 · doi:10.1109/cbms49503.2020.00014

Identification of Temporal Changes on Patients at Risk of LONS with TPRMine: A Case Study in NICU

2020· article· en· W3081590694 on OpenAlexaff
Catherine Inibhunu, Carolyn McGregor

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTime Series Analysis and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentification (biology)Computer scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) provides specialized care for preterm or ill term infants. The onset of many conditions they can develop are not obvious to physicians until they are significantly impacted and this could result in death. An example of such a problem is neonatal infection which is a common cause of death for premature infants. It remains a challenging task for clinicians to accurately diagnose the presence of bacteria on patients with frequent presence of multiple comorbidities. There is potential for early detection of neonatal infections by timely analysis of patient physiological data and this can lead to improved health outcome of critically ill patients. This paper demonstrates application of a method for Temporal Pattern Recognition and Mining (TPRMine) in order to (a) understand if continuous analysis of temporal changes in patient physiological data streams can lead to discovery of pathophysiological patterns from patients at risk of neonatal sepsis and, (b) utilize the resulting analysis for formulating and testing hypothesis facilitating statistical quantification of patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTime Series Analysis and ForecastingFrench-language works237,207