In vitro assessment of the role of the nucleus pulposus in the mechanism of vertebral body fracture under dynamic compressive loading using high-speed cineradiography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Traumatic Spinal Cord Injuries (TSCI) have a disastrous effect on the physical and mental health of both the patients and their relatives. Around 15 % of these injuries are caused by burst fractures, a sub-type of compressive fractures of the vertebral body. The transient dynamics of these fracture have been studied through in vitro experiments coupled with numerical simulations, but no direct observation have ever been made of their genesis and evolution and the behaviour of the nucleus pulposus under compressive loading has only been hypothesized. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the interactions between the vertebral body and the nucleus pulposus under dynamic compressive loading using high-speed cineradiography. A radiopaque agent was injected into the nuclei pulposi of 4 young porcine thoraco-lumbar and lumbar cadaveric segments, and a dynamic compressive load was applied to them using a servo-hydraulic bench-test. The compression process was filmed with a custom high-speed fluoroscope. The nucleus pulposus loaded the vertebral endplate up to 14,142 ± 486 N, before fracturing it and diffusing into the vertebral body. Then, internal pressure seemingly built up until an outward projection of the nucleus pulposus, at an antero-posterior velocity up to 2.9 m.s <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-1</sup> , or until retroprojection of bony fragments into the spinal canal. These results directly corroborate the hypotheses previously made by other studies and stress the unprecedented advantages of using high-speed cineradiography for the study of complex fractures genesis and evolution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".