MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3081618755 · doi:10.1681/asn.2020030384

Modifiable Lifestyle Factors for Primary Prevention of CKD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020· review· en· W3081618755 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityImpact
FundersEuropean Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant AssociationConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y TecnologíaVetenskapsrådetGuangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
KeywordsMeta-analysisPrimary preventionMedicineGerontologyEnvironmental healthInternal medicineDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significance Statement Although CKD incidence is increasing, no evidence-based lifestyle recommendations for CKD primary prevention apparently exist. To evaluate evidence associating modifiable lifestyle factors and incidence of CKD, the authors undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis. Their analysis, which included 104 observational studies of 2,755,719 participants, demonstrated consistency of evidence for a number of measures associated with preventing CKD onset, including increasing dietary intake of vegetables and potassium (21% reduced odds and 22% reduced odds, respectively), increasing physical activity levels (18% reduced odds), moderating alcohol consumption (15% reduced risk), lowering sodium intake (21% increased odds), and stopping tobacco smoking (18% increased risk). In the absence of clinical trial evidence, these findings can help inform public health recommendations and patient-centered discussions in clinical practice about lifestyle measures to prevent CKD. Background Despite increasing incidence of CKD, no evidence-based lifestyle recommendations for CKD primary prevention apparently exist. Methods To evaluate the consistency of evidence associating modifiable lifestyle factors and CKD incidence, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and references from eligible studies from database inception through June 2019. We included cohort studies of adults without CKD at baseline that reported lifestyle exposures (diet, physical activity, alcohol consumption, and tobacco smoking). The primary outcome was incident CKD (eGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 ). Secondary outcomes included other CKD surrogate measures (RRT, GFR decline, and albuminuria). Results We identified 104 studies of 2,755,719 participants with generally a low risk of bias. Higher dietary potassium intake associated with significantly decreased odds of CKD (odds ratio [OR], 0.78; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.65 to 0.94), as did higher vegetable intake (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.90); higher salt intake associated with significantly increased odds of CKD (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.38). Being physically active versus sedentary associated with lower odds of CKD (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.98). Current and former smokers had significantly increased odds of CKD compared with never smokers (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.27). Compared with no consumption, moderate consumption of alcohol associated with reduced risk of CKD (relative risk, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.79 to 0.93). These associations were consistent, but evidence was predominantly of low to very low certainty. Results for secondary outcomes were consistent with the primary finding. Conclusions These findings identify modifiable lifestyle factors that consistently predict the incidence of CKD in the community and may inform both public health recommendations and clinical practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.717
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0130.013
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it