Fatty acid binding protein 3 is associated with peripheral arterial disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) affects more than 150 million people worldwide and is associated with high rates of lower extremity amputation, myocardial infarction, stroke and death. Fatty acid binding protein 3 (FABP3) is released into circulation in patients with skeletal muscle injury. In this pilot study, we investigated a possible association between PAD and blood levels of FABP3. Blood samples were collected from patients with clinical symptoms and diagnostic findings indicative of PAD (PAD group; ankle-brachial index [ABI] <0.9; n = 75) and in those without clinical or diagnostic features of PAD (non-PAD group; ABI >0.9; n = 75) presenting to vascular surgery ambulatory clinics at St. Michael's Hospital. Plasma samples were analyzed by protein multiplex to quantify FABP3 levels. PAD patients were found to have higher blood levels of FABP3 compared to patients without PAD (mean 3.90 ± 1.69 vs 2.03 ± 0.78; P < .001). A subgroup analysis demonstrated that the FABP3 levels were increased by almost two-fold in patients with PAD, independent of coronary artery disease (P < .001) or diabetes mellitus status (P < .001). Moreover, a significant negative correlation between FABP3 and the ABI was observed in PAD and patients without PAD matched groups (r = –0.51; P = .001). Last, immunohistochemistry demonstrated elevated expressions of FABP3 within skeletal muscle obtained from patients with the most severe form of PAD, chronic limb-threatening ischemia, when compared with patients without PAD. Patients with PAD have elevated plasma levels of FABP3. An increasing severity of PAD is associated with higher FABP3 levels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".