MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3081670847 · doi:10.1542/peds.2020-024836

The Pandemics of Racism and COVID-19: Danger and Opportunity

2020· letter· en· W3081670847 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tina L. Cheng, Alison M. Conca-Cheng

Bibliographic record

VenuePEDIATRICS · 2020
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRacial and Ethnic Identity Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRacismPandemicMedicineCriminologyEthnic groupInstitutional racismCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)DutyGender studiesDiseasePsychologySociologyLawPolitical scienceInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a recent crisis. Racism is an enduring crisis that is inflamed in the presence of other crises. The Chinese word for “crisis” is composed of 2 characters, one signifying “danger” and the other, “opportunity” (Fig 1). The pandemics of COVID-19 and racism present clear danger. Our duty is to make sense of the opportunity by learning, understanding, and taking action.In this issue of Pediatrics, Cheah et al1 demonstrate the danger of these twin crises for Chinese American families. They surveyed parents and their children who reported a high rate of recent racist experiences, both in person and online. They also found a correlation with poor mental health. Like the subjects in their survey, the authors of this commentary (a Chinese American academic pediatrician parent and her daughter, a third-year medical student just starting her clinical rotations) have each experienced implicit and explicit bias and the rise of Sinophobia, both inside and outside the health care setting.The findings in the article by Cheah et al1 are consistent with a recent Pew Research Foundation study in which 4 in 10 Americans reported that it has become more common since COVID-19 for people to express racist views about Asian Americans. Both Asian and Black Americans were more likely to report adverse experiences due to their race or ethnicity since the pandemic’s beginning, including observing people acting uncomfortable around them, being subjected to slurs or jokes, and fearing threats or physical attack.2 Reports of racism and physical attacks on Asian Americans have increased markedly in the United States and worldwide.3 Their finding of a link to poor mental health should be no surprise.The COVID-19 pandemic has had far-reaching effects around the world: instilling fear, taking lives, and dramatically altering daily life. With danger comes the search for blame. History is rife with examples of heightened bigotry and xenophobia during crises. There is a long legacy of anti–Asian American racism in the United States, including the Chinese Exclusion Act in the 19th century, the first law that banned immigration on the basis of race. White nativists spread propaganda about the “yellow peril,” labeling new arrivals unclean and unfit.4 The internment of Japanese Americans in the United States during World War II is a sad example of xenophobia during war. In total, >120 000 persons of Japanese ancestry, of whom 62% were American citizens, were forced to relocate and were incarcerated in concentration camps from 1942 to 1945. The 1982 murder of Vincent Chin was an example of economic strife triggering unchecked racism and violence. Chin was beaten to death with a baseball bat by 2 autoworkers who thought he was Japanese; the murderers received a $3000 fine and no jail time. During the severe acute respiratory syndrome outbreak, members of the Chinese and Southeast Asian communities in Canada, including health care workers, felt that the media directly racialized the disease, leaving their communities vulnerable to blame and discrimination. During the current pandemic, Asian American doctors and nurses have reported fighting racism and the coronavirus inside and outside the health care setting.5A more subtle yet pernicious problem is the stereotyping of Asian Americans as a “model minority,” a group whose members are perceived to achieve a higher-than-average degree of success through some combination of innate talent and pull-yourselves-up-by-your-bootstraps hard work. Unfortunately, this labeling ignores the heterogeneity of the population and is frequently used to pit minority groups against one another and blame victims of racism for the resulting circumstances. In fact, racism based on skin color, language, physical features, or other characteristics influences success and is dangerous for all groups.Of course, living with racism in the United States has been part of the lives of African Americans for > 400 years, of American Indians since the continent’s “discovery” by Europeans, and of many other groups. COVID-19 has revealed once again the disproportionate impact of national trauma and crisis on poor and marginalized communities, another example of the deep intertwinement of race, socioeconomic position, and health in our society. It is no accident that the Black Lives Matter movement has arisen at this moment and is finally getting the attention it deserves.Crisis also presents opportunity. We have seen incredible teamwork, innovation, and commitment to change. Looking forward, what can we do to ensure that we seize the moment and embrace positive change? As child health professionals, we have the opportunity and privilege to shape child health and well-being, establishing the foundation for adult health. We also have the responsibility to understand and address the health needs of our patients, including the scourge of racism. We have the stature to advocate for policies and initiatives that address biases and inequities. The American Academy of Pediatrics policy statement “The Impact of Racism on Child and Adolescent Health” outlines how pediatric professionals can address the effects of racism on children and adolescents. It calls for us to optimize clinical practice, improve workforce development and professional education, strengthen research, and deploy systems through community engagement, advocacy, and public policy.6A critical first step is to learn about the history of racism and how it might affect our patients and families, both individually and structurally. Parents and schools must teach children about bias and racism; crucially, this requires acknowledging our country’s fraught history of exploiting racial and ethnic minorities. We must strive to understand how race, as a social determinant of health, has been and continues to be correlated with poorer health outcomes across a plethora of pathologies, groups, and circumstances. A second essential step is to learn about and address our own biases, which affect not only patient interaction but also medical training and workplace conditions. Tools such as the Implicit Association Test (https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/takeatest.html) offer a good starting point. Clinicians must also lead the way in advocating for more racially just systems as well as providing a safe and culturally competent space for understanding and ameliorating the damage.Addressing racism is necessary to achieve health equity. This month’s article on Sinophobia again calls us to action. As the United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres states, we must “act now to strengthen the immunity of our societies against the virus of hate.”3

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.249
Threshold uncertainty score0.845

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePEDIATRICSSame topicRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchFrench-language works237,207