MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3081835091 · doi:10.1111/ajd.13412

Development and validation of a new method for potential use of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index in teledermatology

2020· letter· en· W3081835091 on OpenAlexaff
Jason Wu, Helmut Petto, Yves Dutronc, Nicole Y. Burkhardt, Kurt Gebauer, Melinda Gooderham

Bibliographic record

VenueAustralasian Journal of Dermatology · 2020
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Canadian institutionsSKiN Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsoriasis Area and Severity IndexMedicineErythemaBody surface areaTrunkPsoriasisTeledermatologyDermatologyPhysical therapySurgeryHealth careTelemedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) is a validated, frequently used, psoriasis severity assessment tool.1-3 In several countries, PASI assessment is compulsory for reimbursement considerations.2, 3 PASI calculation requires full body evaluation of the severity of erythema, thickness and scaling of psoriatic plaques in four body regions (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs). Some components of PASI (i.e. plaque thickness, extent of scalp involvement) are difficult to assess by teledermatology, making its incorporation into clinical practice challenging. We sought to develop and validate a model for estimating total PASI score using only the practical PASI features suitable for assessment in teledermatology (i.e. scores for erythema, scaling and affected areas of the trunk, lower limbs and upper limbs; Tele-PASI). The Tele-PASI model was developed (for full details see Supplementary Materials 1) using screening PASI data from 4215 patients enrolled in three multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled ixekizumab trials (UNCOVER-1, NCT01474512; UNCOVER-2, NCT01597245; UNCOVER-3, NCT01646177).4, 5 Of these, 3866 randomised patients (≥18 years) with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (≥6 months), defined as ≥10% body surface area, static Physician’s Global Assessment (sPGA) ≥3, and PASI ≥12 were included in the model. The correlation between scores of thickness and erythema and between scores of thickness and scaling were analysed within each and across the four PASI body regions (head/neck, upper limbs, trunk and lower limbs) (Supplementary Figure S1). Difficult to assess thickness scores were estimated from erythema and scaling scores, and head/neck scores from upper limb and trunk scores (using linear regression). Both were then included in the PASI calculations as surrogates for real measures (Tele-PASI model: Tables S1 and S2). From Pearson correlation coefficients and associated r2-values the respective P-values were calculated. All data processing and statistical analyses were performed using R version 3.0.1. PASI data from baseline up to 12 weeks of treatment from 1691 randomised patients from three additional multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled ixekizumab trials (RHBP, NCT02513550; RHBS, NCT02561806; RHBZ, NCT02634801) were used to validate the Tele-PASI model.6-8 At screening, thickness significantly correlated with both erythema and scaling in all four body regions. Correlation between the original total PASI score and the total PASI score excluding thickness was very high and almost unchanged when the head/neck components were excluded (Supplementary Figure S2). In the model development population, very high correlations were observed between original and modelled total PASI scores at baseline (r2 = 0.95, P < 0.0001) (Fig. 1) and at all follow-up visits, irrespective of treatment (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Figure S3). Similarly, very high correlations between the original and modelled total PASI scores at baseline and at all follow-up visits in all treatment groups were observed in the external model validation population (Supplementary Figures S4-S6). The Tele-PASI model described here estimates total PASI scores before and during treatment using only scores for erythema, scaling and affected areas of the trunk, lower limbs and upper limbs. During model development, very strong correlations between the original and modelled total PASI scores were observed in all treatment groups at screening, baseline and during treatment. The model performance was confirmed using data from three independent trials including various systemic treatments. The modelled total PASI scores correlated very strongly with the original total PASI scores at baseline and during treatment, suggesting that Tele-PASI may be an appropriate tool for PASI assessment in teledermatology settings. The strengths of this study were the use of data from large scale, double-blind, placebo- and active-comparator controlled trials for model development and validation that included various systemic treatments. Because Tele-PASI was developed with data from adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who were enrolled in clinical trials for up to 12 weeks of treatment only and because data were collected during physical examinations and not via photos/live imaging, further real-world validation, including in patients undergoing longer-term treatment, is required. This study has demonstrated that Tele-PASI accurately estimates total PASI for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis receiving various systemic treatments. The Tele-PASI may supplement PASI in clinical practice, especially when face-to-face consultations are not possible and evaluation is made in teledermatology settings (see Supplementary Materials 4 - Worksheet − an online spreadsheet that allows calculation of the Tele-PASI score). The authors thank all the dedicated patients who participated in each of the trials, as well as the investigators and site personnel for their active involvement in all trials described in this study. Eli Lilly and Company was involved in the study design, data collection, data analysis and preparation of the manuscript. Fig S1. Schematic explaining how the Tele-PASI model was developed and validated. Fig S2. Correlation studies in the Tele-PASI model development population based on screening PASI. Fig S3. Original and modelled total PASI scores from screening to Week 12 in IXE Q4W treatment group in model development population (r2 range for IXE [Q2W, Q4W], ETN, and placebo groups was 0.945−0.9982; P <0.0001). Fig S4. Original and modelled total PASI scores at baseline and all follow-up visits in each treatment group in external Tele-PASI model validation population (RHBP trial). Fig S5. Original and modelled total PASI scores from baseline to Week 12 in each treatment group in external Tele-PASI validation population (RHBS trial). Fig S6. Original and modelled total PASI scores from baseline to Week 12 in each treatment group in external Tele-PASI validation population (RHBZ trial). Table S1. Parameters estimate the Tele-PASI model components from the respective scores obtained at screening in the three UNCOVER trials using linear regressions Table S2. Example of original PASI and modelled total PASI calculations Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.329
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAustralasian Journal of DermatologySame topicPsoriasis: Treatment and PathogenesisFrench-language works237,207