MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3081884846 · doi:10.5206/mase/10745

Dynamical analysis of a fractional order model incorporating fear in the disease transmission rate of COVID-19

2020· article· en· W3081884846 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chandan Maji, Debasis Mukherjee

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics in Applied Sciences and Engineering · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUniquenessEquilibrium pointStability theoryBounded functionEpidemic modelMathematicsApplied mathematicsHopf bifurcationStability (learning theory)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Transmission (telecommunications)Order (exchange)Control theory (sociology)DiseaseBifurcationMathematical analysisComputer scienceControl (management)Infectious disease (medical specialty)EconomicsMedicinePhysicsNonlinear systemPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper deals with a fractional-order three-dimensional compartmental model with fear effect. We have investigated whether fear can play an important role or not to spread and control the infectious diseases like COVID-19, SARS etc. in a bounded region. The basic results on uniqueness, non-negativity and boundedness of the solution of the system are investigated. Stability analysis ensures that the disease-free equilibrium point is locally asymptotically stable if carrying capacity greater than a certain threshold value.We have also derived the conditions for which endemic equilibrium is globally asymptotically stable that means the disease persists in the system. Numerical simulation suggests that the fear factor is an important role which is observed through Hopf-bifurcation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematics in Applied Sciences and EngineeringSame topicMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology ModelsFrench-language works237,207