MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3081923111 · doi:10.3390/electronics9091399

Ultra-Wideband Low-Cost High-Efficiency Cavity-Backed Compound Spiral Antenna

2020· article· en· W3081923111 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOntario Centres of Excellence
KeywordsSpiral antennaBalunSpiral (railway)WidebandBandwidth (computing)OpticsLogarithmic spiralMaterials scienceMicrostripAntenna efficiencyAxial ratioElectrical impedanceAntenna (radio)OptoelectronicsMicrostrip antennaPhysicsEngineeringCircular polarizationElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsCoaxial antennaMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A low-cost high-efficiency ultra-wideband (UWB) cavity-backed spiral antenna is proposed. It employs an equiangular spiral enclosed by an Archimedean spiral and it is fed through a tapered microstrip balun. A center-raised cylindrical absorber-free cavity backs the spiral to minimize the backward radiation without decreasing the efficiency. The cavity is designed to ensure an impedance bandwidth exceeding 16:1 ratio (from 350 MHz to 5.5 GHz). Simulated and measured results are presented and compared, demonstrating competitive performance in terms of impedance bandwidth and efficiency. Time–domain measurements indicate fidelity of 0.62 at boresight.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.896
Threshold uncertainty score0.948

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it