MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3082005861 · doi:10.1111/acer.14445

SLC Neurotransmitter Transporters as Therapeutic Targets for Alcohol Use Disorder: A Narrative Review

2020· review· en· W3082005861 on OpenAlexafffund
Eliza R. McColl, Micheline Piquette‐Miller

Bibliographic record

VenueAlcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsAcamprosateNaltrexoneAlcohol use disorderDisulfiramMedicineNeurotransmitterPharmacologyPsychiatryInternal medicineBiologyAlcoholOpioid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is 1 of the most prevalent of all substance use disorders and contributes significantly to global disease burden. Despite its prevalence, <10% of individuals with AUD receive treatment. A significant barrier to receiving treatment is a lack of effective pharmacotherapies. While 3 medications have been approved by the FDA for AUD (disulfiram, acamprosate, naltrexone), their efficacy remains low. Furthermore, a number of undesirable side effects associated with these drugs further reduce patient compliance. Thus, research into new effective pharmacotherapies for AUD is warranted. Due to their involvement in regulating synaptic neurotransmitter levels, solute carrier (SLC) transporters could be targeted for developing effective treatment strategies for AUD. Indeed, a number of studies have shown beneficial reductions in alcohol consumption through the use of drugs that target transporters of dopamine, serotonin, glutamate, glycine, and GABA. The purpose of this narrative review is to summarize preclinical and clinical studies from the last 2 decades targeting SLC neurotransmitter transporters for the treatment of AUD. Limitations, as well as future directions for expanding this field, are also discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.412
GPT teacher head0.548
Teacher spread0.136 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlcoholism Clinical and Experimental ResearchSame topicNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorFrench-language works237,207