Optimal filter characterization for photoplethysmography-based pulse rate and pulse power spectrum estimation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Photoplethysmography (PPG) is a non-invasive, low-cost optical technique used to assess the cardiovascular system. In recent years, PPG-based heart rate measurement has gained significant attention due to its popularity in wearable devices, as well as its practicality relative to electrocardiography (ECG). Studies comparing the dynamics of ECG- and PPG-based heart rate measures have found small differences between these two modalities; differences related to the physiological processes behind each technique. In this work, we analyzed the spectral coherence and the signal-to-noise ratio between isolated PPG pulses and the raw PPG signal in order to: (i) determine the optimal filter to enhance pulse detection from raw PPG for improved heart rate estimation, and (ii) characterize the spectral content of the PPG pulse. The proposed methods were evaluated on 27000 pulses from a PPG database acquired from 42 participants (adults and children). The results showed that the optimal bandpass filter to enhance PPG from the adult group was 0.6-3.3 Hz, while for the children group it was 1.0-2.7 Hz. The spectral analysis on the pulse signal showed that similar bandwidths were found for the adult (0.8-2.4 Hz) and children (0.9-2.7 Hz) groups. We hope that the results presented herein serve as a baseline for pulse detection algorithms and assist with the development of more sophisticated PPG processing algorithms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".